<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Screen Junkies Archives - Tampa Review</title>
	<atom:link href="https://tampareview.org/tag/screen-junkies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://tampareview.org/tag/screen-junkies/</link>
	<description>Celebrating 60 Years of Literary Publishing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 17:13:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.7</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">232589785</site>	<item>
		<title>What 26 Minutes of Twilight Silence Can Teach Us</title>
		<link>https://tampareview.org/what-26-minutes-of-twilight-silence-can-teach-us/</link>
					<comments>https://tampareview.org/what-26-minutes-of-twilight-silence-can-teach-us/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[utpress]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 17:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Screen Junkies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[style]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twilight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[word choice]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tampareviewonline.org/?p=11253</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Clearly, the Twilight Saga, with over a hundred millions books sold, does some things right &#8212; does them well, even. Elements about the characters connect with the readers. The story is enjoyable for at least a few million people. We &#8212; non-Twilight-enjoyers &#8212; berate the series quite a lot, perhaps too much. But there is ... <span class="more"><a class="more-link" href="https://tampareview.org/what-26-minutes-of-twilight-silence-can-teach-us/">[Read more...]</a></span></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://tampareview.org/what-26-minutes-of-twilight-silence-can-teach-us/">What 26 Minutes of Twilight Silence Can Teach Us</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tampareview.org">Tampa Review</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly, the <em>Twilight Saga</em>, with over a hundred millions books sold, does some things right &#8212; does them <em>well</em>, even. Elements about the characters connect with the readers. The story is enjoyable for at least a few million people. We &#8212; non-Twilight-enjoyers &#8212; berate the series quite a lot, perhaps too much. But there is just so much rate to be.</p>
<p>Take, for instance, this wonderfully edited selection of scenes from the <em>Twilight Saga</em> movies. Compiled by the YouTube channel Screen Junkies &#8212; the channel that produces the ever-popular <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTfBH-XFdSc&amp;feature=share&amp;list=SP86F4D497FD3CACCE">Honest Trailers</a> series &#8212; the following clip contains about 26 minutes of Twilight characters staring at each other:</p>
<p><iframe title="The Twilight Saga: Just The Stares" width="700" height="394" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/TpU5O_Uur_c?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>A drug for Hollywood directors, &#8220;meaningful stares&#8221; make it into nearly every Hollywood movie. These scene anchors often mean nothing to the viewer. They can sap a plot&#8217;s rhythm and insert unnecessary punctuation for more necessary dialogue and actual physical action.</p>
<p>But this is not just a Hollywood problem. This is a first draft problem. Too often in my own writing, I return to a scene and find it rife with boring action. &#8220;Jason looked at the parcel in Stef&#8217;s hand.&#8221; Or: &#8220;Williamson watched the leaves swirl away.&#8221; Or: &#8220;I studied the veins in her hand.&#8221;</p>
<p>A little bit of this kind of writing can be okay. Sometimes we, as authors, need to discretely communicate that a particular character noticed an event or visual characteristic somewhere. But more often than not, especially when writing from first person or third-person close, the readers intrinsically assume any descriptions are noticed or at least obvious to the main character or speaker.</p>
<p>So instead of describing &#8220;her hand,&#8221; I can more efficiently apply a verb to the description and keep the passage more efficient. &#8220;The veins in her hand throbbed blue.&#8221; Or even better, I could have those vivid hands performing a plot-pushing action: &#8220;The veins in her hand throbbed blue as she squeezed my throat.&#8221;</p>
<p>Now we&#8217;re talking! Which is more than <em>Twilight </em>did in those 26 minutes.</p>
<p><em>*Zing!*</em></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://tampareview.org/what-26-minutes-of-twilight-silence-can-teach-us/">What 26 Minutes of Twilight Silence Can Teach Us</a> appeared first on <a href="https://tampareview.org">Tampa Review</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://tampareview.org/what-26-minutes-of-twilight-silence-can-teach-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">11253</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
